- UniScoops
- Posts
- Should you lie to save Tom? š¤„
Should you lie to save Tom? š¤„
Plus: āMagicā Cancer Pill, Danteās Divine Comedy, and Courtly Love Songs š°
I will never accept an unsigned painting from Picasso. If he doesnāt sign it, I donāt know which way to hang it.
Howdy, this is UniScoops! No IT outages are gonna stop US from reaching YOUR inbox!
So, without further adoā¦
Hereās a taste of what weāre serving today:
Should you lie to save Tom? š¤„
PLUS: āMagicā Cancer Pill, Danteās Divine Comedy, and Courtly Love Songs.
PHILOSOPHY
Should you lie to save Tom? š¤„

Imagine youāve got two people in front of you: your best friend, Tom, whoās a Bluecastle United fan, and Brian. Brian is a massive hater of Bluecastle United, but doesnāt know that Tom is actually a diehard fan. When Tom leaves to pop to the loo, Brian tells you that he dislikes Bluecastle United so much, that he beats up anyone he sees who supports the team (gasp!). He then tells you that he has suspicions that Tom might be āone of thoseā, and asks you: āIs Tom a Bluecastle United fan?ā
At this point, youāve got a decision to make. Do you stick to the values of honesty that Ms Smith taught you back in Year 3 and tell the truth? Or, do you tell a lie in order to protect your friend from Brianās fist? What you decide to do might give you an indication of whether you are what philosophers call a consequentialist or a deontologist.
š” Things to consider
Consequentialism: Consequentialism is an ethical theory that judges whether or not something is right by what its consequences are. For instance, most people would agree that lying is wrong. However, if telling a lie would lead to better consequences than telling the truth (e.g., lying to Brian about Tomās football affiliations), consequentialism says itās the right thing to do. Do you think a consequentialist approach is best when dealing with Brian? Why/why not? Can you think of some problems we might face if weāre always a consequentialist?

Tom when you decide to lie to Brian
Deontology: The word ādeontologyā comes from the Greek deon meaning ādutyā. Unlike a consequentialist, which would judge the rightness of actions by their result, a deontologist doesnāt have to weigh the costs and benefits of a situation. Instead, a deontologist believes that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules and principles. For instance, a deontologist might argue that an action, such as lying, is wrong because we should follow the universal moral law āDo not lieā. We can reach this moral law because we know that lying is bad. What are the benefits of deontology over consequentialism?

⦠not to lie. Sorry Tom!
Repugnant Actions: Both ethical theories have their advantages and disadvantages. One of the key ways of sussing out criticisms of an ethical theory is to produce an example which leads to a repugnant, or undesirable, conclusion. For example, letās suppose economists could prove that the world economy would be stronger, and that the large majority of people would be happier and more productive, if we just enslaved 5% of the population. Although the majority of people would benefit from this idea, most would never agree to it. However, if we take the consequentialist approach and judge the idea solely on its results, it seems that we have no choice but to accept it, as the consequences (improved world economy) are more important than the initial action (enslaving people). Can you think of a similar example to pose against a deontologist?
š Find out more

š The cherry on top
š āMagicā Cancer Pill: Researchers have developed a pill-sized capsule that, when swallowed by a patient, can diagnose, monitor, and treat gastrointestinal diseases including Barrettās esophagus, a condition known to be a precursor to esophageal cancer. This is a quick news read which is great if youāre interested in Biomedicine.
š„ Danteās Divine Comedy: In the epic poem The Divine Comedy, Florentine poet Dante Alighieri journeys through hell, purgatory, and heaven. First published in 1320, the poem is best known today for its detailed depiction of the Christian afterlife. However, is it also a political statement? Check out this article if youāre interested in Religious Studies or Modern Languages.
š° Courtly Love Songs: Song lyrics acted as a sexual script for aristocrats, revealing some edgy practices that ignited their imaginations. Can they give us an insight into medieval sex lives? This is a great article if youāre interested in Music.

š Keep your eyes peeled forā¦
22nd July:
23rd July:
24th July:
25th July:
26th July:

š³ļø Poll
How was today's email?We'd love to hear your feedback! |
Thatās it for this week! Weād like to thank this weekās writer: Gabriel Pang (Philosophy).
š Like UniScoops?
Forward this edition to someone whoād love to read it for extra kudos!
š¢ Want to tell us something?
Reply to this email to tell us what you think about UniScoops, or to give us any suggestions on what youād like to see.
š§ New to UniScoops?
Get your weekly fix of academia with our fun, thought-provoking newsletter. No jargon, no fluff, just the good stuff. Subscribe today.
Reply