- UniScoops
- Posts
- Is Star Wars REALLY science fiction??!
Is Star Wars REALLY science fiction??!
PLUS: The Chemistry That Feeds Billions, Courtly Love, and The Psychology of Urban Planning šļø
There is nothing better than a friend, unless it is a friend with chocolate.
Good morning, this is UniScoops! The only inbox arrival more anticipated than your Amazon delivery confirmation.
Hereās a taste of what weāre serving today:
Is Star Wars REALLY science fiction??! š½
PLUS: The Chemistry That Feeds Billions, Courtly Love, and The Psychology of Urban Planning šļø
PHILOSOPHY
Is Star Wars REALLY science fiction??! š½

Even the Jedi are confused with Philosophy
We all know Star Wars⦠the spaceships, the aliens, the robots, the lightsabers, and the intergalactic battles. If you ask anyone what genre Star Wars is part of, most would say sci-fi⦠right?
Well, in classic philosophy fashion, many philosophers working in the realm of Aesthetics (sometimes called the Philosophy of Art) have been questioning our assumptions about art (specifically fiction) and why we categorise works into genres. This has led them to ask questions like: What is genre? How do we know if a specific film, novel, or TV series belongs to a genre? Is there anything in particular that works in a genre have in common?
š” Things to consider
Specific Features: A lot of peopleās first response would be to say, āSurely we just have to look at whatās in the work to tell what genre itās in?ā That does seem intuitive. For example, we might say romance movies typically include a romantic relationship (duh!), while science fiction includes futuristic technologies (think the Millennium Falcon in Star Wars or the TARDIS in Doctor Who). However, this view seems to ignore a genreās ability to evolve. For instance, while horror films in the past often included some kind of āscary monsterā to evoke fear and disgust (like zombies), that has become less common in modern horror. Can you think of any examples? Hereās a hint: consider films that build dread through psychological tension, trauma, or social commentary.

Classic horror: monsters and mayhem (although maybe scarier than Homer Simpson)
Purpose: Contemporary Oxford philosopher Catharine Abell has recently suggested that what makes something part of a genre is the purpose it was created for. For example, if someone made a movie to scare people, then itās part of the horror genre. Likewise, if someone wrote a novel to make people laugh, itās part of the comedy genre. So, itās not about specific features in the story, but about what the creator intended the work to do and what the audience expects it to do. This view also helps explain why a genreās features change. They evolve because authors, filmmakers, and other creators develop new, innovative ways to achieve a genreās purpose. Thatās why silent comedy films from the early twentieth century look very different from the comedy films you can watch on Netflix today!

Comedy or horror? Depends on what the creator intended.
Interpretation and Evaluation: Itās all well and good to explore philosophical theories about genre, but why should we even care about categorising works in this way? Is it even worth discussing? One reason we might care is that genre affects how we interpret artworks. For example, imagine reading a book where the narrator says someone āgave up her heart willingly.ā If that sentence appeared in a realist romantic novel, weād likely interpret it metaphorically: she fell deeply in love. However, if we read the same sentence in a sci-fi novel, we might interpret it literally: maybe sheās offering up her heart to live eternally as a robot? In a similar way, genre can affect how we evaluate an artwork (whether we judge it as good or bad.) How might genre shape that evaluation?

Interpreting the same sentence in different genres be likeā¦
š Find out more

š The cherry on top
š¾ The Chemistry That Feeds Billions: This article explores how Fritz Haber cracked the code to convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, and how Carl Bosch scaled it for industry. The result? Synthetic fertilizer that now supports nearly half the worldās food supply ā and also made explosives for WWI. A great read if youāre into Chemistry.
š Courtly Love: This illustrated British Library article explores the medieval origins of ācourtly love,ā tracing its rise from Arthurian battles and bardic flattery to knights literally fighting backwards to impress queens. With duelling hearts, burning love, and monkeys in school, itās a visual feast and sharp primer for those interested in Literature.
šļø The Psychology of Urban Planning: This deep dive reveals how urban design is now merging with neuroscience. Using virtual cities, physiological sensors, and immersive experiments, researchers are decoding how layout, green space, and even the visual texture of a street influence stress, navigation, and wellbeing. A thoughtful read if youāre interested in Psychology, Architecture, or Sociology.

š Keep your eyes peeled forā¦
18th June:
19th June:
23rd June:

š³ļø Poll
How was today's email?We'd love to hear your feedback! |
Thatās it for this week! Weād like to thank this weekās writer: Gabriel Pang.
š Like UniScoops?
Forward this edition to someone whoād love to read it for extra kudos!
š¢ Want to tell us something?
Reply to this email to tell us what you think about UniScoops, or to give us any suggestions on what youād like to see.
š§ New to UniScoops?
Get your weekly fix of academia with our fun, thought-provoking newsletter. No jargon, no fluff, just the good stuff. Subscribe today.
Reply