❝

Think like a proton. Always positive.

Unknown

Good morning, it’s UniScoops! We’re the weekly newsletter that gives you the same rush as finally deleting all those old, unnecessary screenshots.

Here’s a taste of what we’re serving today:

  • Can You Make a Contract With Someone You Don’t Know Exists? 👻

  • PLUS: Medieval Mental Health, Cryptococcus Fungus, and Maths as Thought 🔢

LAW

Can You Make a Contract With Someone You Don’t Know Exists? 👻

If Andy believes they are entering into a contract with Bob (we’ll call him the ‘agent’), but Bob is actually acting on behalf of Cora (who is known as the ‘principal’), who is legally considered a party to the contract? This question is answered by the doctrine of Undisclosed Agency, which allows a principal to authorise an agent to form a contract on their behalf without revealing their existence to the third party.

💡 Things to consider

  • How does this work?: The rules surrounding this were explained within the case Siu Yin Kwan v Eastern Insurance Co Ltd [1994] 2 AC 199; Lord Lloyd stated that both the undisclosed principal and agent can sue or be sued on a contract if the agent was acting within their actual authority and genuinely intended to act on behalf of the principal. An agent's actual authority is the specific authority they are given by the principal, whether that be expressly or impliedly. So, if an agent acted outside what they were allowed to do, or clearly acted for themselves rather than the principal, the contract would only exist between the agent and the third party. There's some debate over whether this doctrine creates a new, direct contract between the third party and the principal, or if the principal has the right to step into the agent's shoes and intervene in a contract made between the agent and third party. Either way, there's still effectively a contractual relationship between the principal and third party as if they had made the contract themselves.

secret smell GIF

It’s kinda sneaky tho…

  • What issues does this create?: Undisclosed Agency is often viewed as an anomaly in the law because it directly conflicts with the doctrine of privity of contract. This fundamental principle in contract law holds that only those who are directly party to a contract can enforce or be bound by its terms. While this principle has been somewhat watered down in recent years—for example, s.1 of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 allows third parties to be party to a contract if it purports to confer a benefit on them—undisclosed agency is still a striking exception that allows a hidden principal to step into the agreement without the third party's knowledge. This peculiarity is even more pronounced when compared to civil law systems such as France and Germany, which require agents to act openly and on behalf of the principal, thereby preventing the existence of a secret principal.

Spongebob Squarepants Money GIF

Principals often use undisclosed agents in commercial transactions to secure better prices by hiding their identity and true purchasing power.

  • If Undisclosed Agency fits awkwardly within the law, why is it used?: Principals often use undisclosed agents in commercial transactions to secure better prices by hiding their identity and true purchasing power. Also, as noted by Lord Lindley in Siu Yin Kwan v Eastern Insurance Co Ltd [1994] 2 AC 199, third parties in commercial transactions are usually indifferent to the existence of an undisclosed principal; it is not common that a third party only wants to deal with the specific agent they are contracting with. This doctrine also shields principals from an agent's insolvency or bankruptcy. Since the contract is effectively between the principal and third party, any rights or property under the contract would not form part of an insolvent or bankrupt agent's estate, meaning their creditors would have no claim to it. Civil legal systems provide insolvency protections if such situations were to occur, but this protection operates more slowly than the UK approach of allowing principals to bypass the agent entirely. So, this doctrine provides a great deal of commercial convenience despite clashing with fundamental contractual principles.

🔎 Find out more

🍒 The cherry on top

🗳️ Poll

How was today's email?

We'd love to hear your feedback!

Login or Subscribe to participate

That’s it for this week! We’d like to thank this week’s writer: Heidi Nicholas.

💚 Like UniScoops?

Forward this edition to someone who’d love to read it for extra kudos!

📢 Want to tell us something?

Reply to this email to tell us what you think about UniScoops, or to give us any suggestions on what you’d like to see.

🧐 New to UniScoops?

Get your weekly fix of academia with our fun, thought-provoking newsletter. No jargon, no fluff, just the good stuff. Subscribe today.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate